{ "status" : "success", "data" : [["206","Allegheny Plateau, Glaciated","2021","Faber-Langendoen, D., K.S Walz, J. Hafstad, R. Ring, R. Goad, M. Harkness. 2021. Ecoregional Floristic Quality Assessment Tools for the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic Regions: Linking EPA Region 1 (New Jersey and New York) with EPA Region 1 and 3. NatureServe."],["70","Appalachian Mtn (EPA Ecoregions 66,67,68,69) of KY, TN, NC, SC, GA, AL","2013","Gianopulos, K. 2014. Coefficient of Conservatism Database Development for Wetland Plants Occurring in the Southeast United States. NC Dept. of Envir. Quality, Div. of Water Resources: Wetlands Branch. Report to the EPA. developed with 15 expert botanists"],["263","Arcadia Lake","2024","Friedman Messick UCO"],["242","Arkansas","2024","Witsell, T., V.L. McDaniel, B.T. Baker, D.M. Zollner, G.L. De Jong, S.L. Hooks. 2024. Coefficients of conservatism for the vascular flora of Arkansas. Phytoneuron 2024-46: 1\u201399. Published 22 June 2024."],["108","Atlantic Coastal Pine Barrens (8.5.4) ","2017","NEIWPCC FQA Project. Metzler, K., Ring, R. and D. Faber-Langendoen. Unpublished database of coefficients of conservatism for Omernik Level 3 Ecoregion 84"],["136","Atlantic Coastal Pine Barrens (8.5.4)","2018","NatureServe-NEIWPCC Northeast FQA Project. Metzler, K., Ring, R. and D. Faber-Langendoen. Database of coefficients of conservatism for Omernik Level 3 Ecoregion 84"],["204","Atlantic Coastal Pine Barrens (8.5.4)","2021","Faber-Langendoen, D., K.S Walz, J. Hafstad, R. Ring, R. Goad, M. Harkness. 2021. Ecoregional Floristic Quality Assessment Tools for the Northeast and Mid-Atlantic Regions: Linking EPA Region 1 (New Jersey and New York) with EPA Region 1 and 3. NatureServe"],["264","Belle Oklahoma","2024","Friedman Messick UCO"],["1","Chicago Region","1994","Swink, F. and G. Wilhelm. 1994. Plants of the Chicago Region, 4th ed., Indiana Academy of Science, Indianapolis, 921 p."],["9","Chicago Region USACE","2013","Herman, B., Sliwinski, R. and S. Whitaker. 2013. Chicago Region FQA (Floristic Quality Assessment) Calculator. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Chicago, IL. [beta version]"],["29","Chicago Region USACE","2014","Herman, B., Sliwinski, R. and S. Whitaker. 2014. Chicago Region FQA (Floristic Quality Assessment) Calculator. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Chicago, IL. [Version 1.16.14]"],["149","Chicago Region USACE","2017","https:\/\/www.lrc.usace.army.mil\/Missions\/Regulatory\/FQA.aspx"],["73","Coastal Plain of the Southeast (EPA Ecoregions 63,65)","2013","Gianopulos, K. 2014. Coefficient of Conservatism Database Development for Wetland Plants Occurring in the Southeast United States. NC Dept. of Envir. Quality, Div. of Water Resources: Wetlands Branch. Report to the EPA. developed with 15 expert botanists"],["202","Colorado","2020","Colorado Natural Heritage Program"],["279","Cushing, OK","2025","UCO - BIO graduate thesis"],["281","Cushing, REF Site","2025","UCO - Messick\/Warr"],["280","Cushing, UOW Site","2025","UCO - Messick\/Warr"],["81","Dakotas","2017","Updated the nomenclature by comparing to ITIS on the 2001 list and removed duplicates"],["54","Dakotas (excluding the Black Hills)","2001","The Northern Great Plains Floristic Quality Assessment Panel. 2001. Coefficients of conservatism for the vascular flora of the Dakotas and adjacent grasslands. U.S. Geological Survey, Biological Resources Division, Information and Technology Report USGS\/BRD\/ITR-2001-0001, 32 p."],["82","Dakotas (excluding the Black Hills)","2017","Jeff Hansen used the Dakotas 2001 database and updated nomenclature using ITIS"],["23","Delaware","2013","McAvoy, W.A. 2013. The Flora of Delaware Online Database. Delaware Division of Fish and  Wildlife, Species Conservation and Research Program, Smyrna, Delaware.  http:\/\/www.wra.udel.edu\/de-flora\/Introduction\/ "],["128","Eastern British Columbia, Canada - East of Coast and Cascade Mountains","2018","BC Wildlife Federation Project. Codes of Conservatism prepared by Jamie Fenneman and Terry Mcintosh. Includes only wetlands species. "],["107","Eastern Great Lakes and Hudson Lowlands (8.1.1)","2017","NEIWPCC FQA Project. Ring, R. and D. Faber-Langendoen. Unpublished database of coefficients of conservatism for Omernik Level 3 Ecoregion 83"],["135","Eastern Great Lakes and Hudson Lowlands (8.1.1)","2018","NatureServe-NEIWPCC Northeast FQA Project. Ring, R. and D. Faber-Langendoen. Database of coefficients of conservatism for Omernik Level 3 Ecoregion 83"],["80","Flora of the Chicago Region","2017","Flora of the Chicago Region UFQA Database. 2018. Kenneth Johnson. [As per Flora of the Chicago Region: A Floristic and Ecological Synthesis. 2017. Gerould Wilhelm and Laura Rericha. Indiana Academy of Science. Indianapolis, IN.]"],["7","Illinois","1997","Taft, J. B., Wilhelm, G. S., Ladd, D. M., & Masters, L. A. 1997. Floristic quality assessment for vegetation in Illinois, a method for assessing vegetation integrity. Westville: Illinois Native Plant Society."],["162","Illinois ","2020","Illinois 1997 list with family names (edited by C. Benda)"],["75","Illinois Lakeshore Ravine Rapid FQA","2015","This is a database test for a ravine rapid assessment method being developed by the Chicago Botanic Garden and partners."],["14","Indiana","2004","Rothrock, P.E. 2004. Floristic quality assessment in Indiana: The concept, use, and development of coefficients of conservatism. Final Report for ARN A305-4-53, EPA Wetland Program Development Grant CD975586-01."],["156","Indiana","2019","Update of 2004 Indiana database"],["69","Interior Plateau (EPA Ecoregions 70,71,72), of KY, TN, and AL","2013","Gianopulos, K. 2014. Coefficient of Conservatism Database Development for Wetland Plants Occurring in the Southeast United States. NC Dept. of Envir. Quality, Div. of Water Resources: Wetlands Branch. Report to the EPA. developed with 15 expert botanists"],["20","Iowa","2001","Drobney, P.D., G.S. Wilhelm, D. Horton, M. Leoschke, D. Lewis, J. Pearson, D. Roosa, D. Smith. 2001. Floristic quality assessment for the state of Iowa. Unpublished report."],["37","Kansas","2014","Freeman, Craig C.  2014. Coefficients of conservatism for Kansas vascular plants and selected life history attributed. Kansas Biological Survey and R.L. McGregor Herbarium, University of Kansas."],["272","Kentucky and Tennessee","2023","Office of KY Nature Preserves"],["15","Louisiana (Coastal Prairie)","2006","Allain, L., L. Smith, C. Allen, M.F. Vidrine, and J.B. Grace. 2006. A Floristic Quality Assessment System for the Coastal Prairie of Louisiana.  Proceedings of the 19th North American Prairie Conference."],["56","Maine","2014","Maine Natural Areas Program"],["106","Maine\/New Brunswick Plains and Hills (8.1.8)","2017","NEIWPCC FQA Project. Cameron, D. and D. Faber-Langendoen. Unpublished database of coefficients of conservatism for Omernik Level 3 Ecoregion 82"],["134","Maine\/New Brunswick Plains and Hills (8.1.8)","2018","NatureServe-NEIWPCC Northeast FQA Project. Cameron, D. and D. Faber-Langendoen. Database of coefficients of conservatism for Omernik Level 3 Ecoregion 82"],["194","Maricopa County 2021, Arizona","2021","Maricopa County Parks and Recreation and Desert Botanic Garden. 2021 J. Armstrong, W. Hodgson, S. Jones, K. Barron, D. Setaro and A. B. Raschke Floristic Quality Assessment: Development and Application in Maricopa County, Arizona"],["50","Michigan","2014","Reznicek, A.A., M.R. Penskar, B.S. Walters, and B.S. Slaughter.  2014.  Michigan Floristic Quality Assessment Database.  Herbarium, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI and Michigan Natural Features Inventory, Michigan State University, Lansing, MI. http:\/\/michiganflora.net "],["267","Michigan","2024","Merjent"],["195","Mid-Atlantic","2012","MAWWG"],["28","Mid-Atlantic Allegheny Plateau (glaciated)","2012","Mid-Atlantic Wetland Workgroup (MAWWG). 2012. Floristic Quality Assessment Index (FQAI) calculator. "],["27","Mid-Atlantic Allegheny Plateau (non-glaciated)","2012","Mid-Atlantic Wetland Workgroup (MAWWG). 2012. Floristic Quality Assessment Index (FQAI) calculator. "],["24","Mid-Atlantic Coastal Plain","2012","Mid-Atlantic Wetland Workgroup (MAWWG). 2012. Floristic Quality Assessment Index (FQAI) calculator. "],["199","Mid-Atlantic Coastal Plain with invasives","2012","MAWWG"],["25","Mid-Atlantic Piedmont Region","2012","Mid-Atlantic Wetland Workgroup (MAWWG). 2012. Floristic Quality Assessment Index (FQAI) calculator. "],["197","Mid-Atlantic Piedmont with non-natives","2012","MAWWG"],["26","Mid-Atlantic Ridge and Valley Region","2012","Mid-Atlantic Wetland Workgroup (MAWWG). 2012. Floristic Quality Assessment Index (FQAI) calculator. "],["10","Minnesota Wetlands","2007","Milburn, S. A., M. Bourdaghs, and J. J. Husveth. 2007. Floristic Quality Assessment for Minnesota Wetlands. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, St. Paul, Minn."],["12","Missouri","1993","Ladd, D.M., 1993. Coefficients of conservatism for Missouri vascular flora. The Nature Conservancy, St. Louis, MO, USA."],["63","Missouri","2015","Ladd, D. and J.R. Thomas. 2015. Ecological Checklist of the Missouri Flora for Floristic Quality Assessment. Phytoneuron 2015-12: 1-274"],["127","Morris County, NJ","2017","NJ State list by Walz, et al (2017) with added liverworts and editing by Barringer"],["36","Nebraska","2003","Rolfsmeier, S. and G. Steinauer. 2003. Vascular Plants of Nebraska (Version I - July 2003). Nebraska Natural Heritage Program, Nebraska Game and Parks Commission. Lincoln, Nebraska. 57 pp. Updated 2013."],["83","New Hampshire","2013","NEIWPCC- http:\/\/neiwpcc.org\/our-programs\/wetlands-aquatic-species\/nebawwg\/nqa\/"],["65","New Jersey","2006","Bowman's Hill Wildflower Preserve Plant Stewardship Index"],["78","New Jersey","2013","Bowman's Hill Wildflower Preserve in collaboration with Karl Anderson, Emile De Vito, Ted Gordon, Tom Halliwell, Linda Kelly, Mary Leck, Bill Olson, Bill Rawlyk and Kathleen Strakosch Walz"],["150","New Jersey","2018","Walz, Kathleen S., Linda Kelly, Karl Anderson, Keith Bowman, Barbara Andreas, Richard Andrus, Scott Schuette, William Schumacher, Sean Robinson, Terry O'Brien, Eric Karlin and Jason Hafstad. 2018.  Universal Floristic Quality Assessment Index for Vascular Plants and Mosses of New Jersey:  Coefficient of Conservancy (CoC) Values for Species and Genera. New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, New Jersey Forest Service, Office of Natural Lands Management, Trenton, NJ, 08625. Submitted to United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region 2, for State Wetlands Protection Development Grant, Section 104(B)(3); CFDA No. 66.461, CD97225809."],["157","New Jersey","2019","Walz, Kathleen S., Linda Kelly, Karl Anderson, Keith Bowman, Barbara Andreas, Richard Andrus, Scott Schuette, William Schumacher, Sean Robinson, Terry O'Brien, Eric Karlin and Jason Hafstad. 2018. Universal Floristic Quality Assessment Index for Vascular Plants and Mosses of New Jersey: Coefficient of Conservancy (CoC) Values for Species and Genera (Updated November 2019). New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, New Jersey Forest Service, Office of Natural Lands Management, Trenton, NJ, 08625. Submitted to United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region 2, for State Wetlands Protection Development Grant, Section 104(B)(3); CFDA No. 66.461, CD97225809."],["161","New Mexico's Middle Rio Grande","2019","University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign, publication in review  "],["105","Northeastern Coastal Zone (8.1.7)","2017","NEIWPCC FQA Project. Metzler, K. and D. Faber-Langendoen. Unpublished database of coefficients of conservatism for Omernik Level 3 Ecoregion 59"],["132","Northeastern Coastal Zone (8.1.7)","2018","NatureServe-NEIWPCC Northeast FQA Project. Metzler, K. and D. Faber-Langendoen. Database of coefficients of conservatism for Omernik Level 3 Ecoregion 59"],["104","Northern Appalachian and Atlantic Maritime Highlands (5.3.1)","2017","NEIWPCC FQA Project. Gilman, A. and D. Faber-Langendoen. Unpublished database of coefficients of conservatism for Omernik Level 3 Ecoregion 58"],["131","Northern Appalachian and Atlantic Maritime Highlands (5.3.1)","2018","NatureServe-NEIWPCC Northeast FQA Project. Gilman, A. and D. Faber-Langendoen. Database of coefficients of conservatism for Omernik Level 3 Ecoregion 58"],["219","Ohio","2004","Floristic quality assessment index (FQAI) for vascular plants and mosses for the State of Ohio"],["230","OK County","2024","This FQA database is part of my master's thesis at University of Central Oklahoma. The C-values are from an amalgamation of sources: Dr. Bruce Hoagland, the surrounding states C-values, Dr. Jenna Messick, and Micah Friedman"],["261","OK county OK","2024","Friedman Messick UCO"],["228","Oklahoma","2024","This FQA database is part of my master's thesis at University of Central Oklahoma. The C-values are from an amalgamation of sources: Dr. Bruce Hoagland, the surrounding states C-values, Dr. Jenna Messick, and Micah Friedman"],["229","Oklahoma County","2024","This FQA database is part of my master's thesis at University of Central Oklahoma. The C-values are from an amalgamation of sources: Dr. Bruce Hoagland, the surrounding states C-values, Dr. Jenna Messick, and Micah Friedman"],["66","Pennsylvania Piedmont","2006","Bowman's Hill Wildflower Preserve Plant Stewardship Index"],["77","Pennsylvania Piedmont","2013","Bowman's Hill Wildflower Preserve in collaboration with Janet Ebert, Jack Holt and Anne Rhoads"],["168","Piedmont Region of the Southeast","2020","Stantec"],["68","Piedmont region of the Southeast NC, SC, GA, AL, MS, FL, TN, KY","2013","NC Division of Water Resources with Southeast expert botanists; https:\/\/www.researchgate.net\/publication\/301220060_Coefficient_of_Conservatism_Database_Development_for_Wetland_Plants_Occurring_in_the_Southeastern_United_States"],["265","Shared Sites OK","2024","Friedman Messick UCO"],["74","Southern Coastal Plain (EPA Ecoregion 75)","2013","Gianopulos, K. 2014. Coefficient of Conservatism Database Development for Wetland Plants Occurring in the Southeast United States. NC Dept. of Envir. Quality, Div. of Water Resources: Wetlands Branch. Report to the EPA. developed with 15 expert botanists"],["2","Southern Ontario","1995","Oldham, M.J., W.D. Bakowsky, and D.A. Sutherland. 1995. Floristic quality assessment system for southern  Ontario. Natural Heritage Information Centre, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Peterborough, Ontario."],["240","Southern Ontario","2023","Dougan and Associates"],["239","Southern Ontario","2024","Dougan & Associates "],["266","Test","2024","EVS"],["273","testing","2025","this is a test only"],["160","Texas Blackland Prairies","2019","Reemts, C. M., and J. A. Eidson. 2019. Choosing Plant Diversity Metrics: A Tallgrass Prairie Case Study. Ecological Restoration 37:233-245."],["5","WA - Eastern Washington State (Columbia Basin)","2013","F. J. Rocchio and R. C. Crawford. 2013. Floristic Quality Assessment for Washington Vegetation. Washington Natural Heritage Program, Washington Department of Natural Resources, Olympia, Washington. Baseline nomenclature: USDA PLANTS"],["4","WA - Eastern Washington State (Mountains)","2013","F. J. Rocchio and R. C. Crawford. 2013. Floristic Quality Assessment for Washington Vegetation. Washington Natural Heritage Program, Washington Department of Natural Resources, Olympia, Washington. Baseline nomenclature: USDA PLANTS"],["6","WA - Western Washington State","2013","F. J. Rocchio and R. C. Crawford. 2013. Floristic Quality Assessment for Washington Vegetation. Washington Natural Heritage Program, Washington Department of Natural Resources, Olympia, Washington. Baseline nomenclature: USDA PLANTS"],["64","West Virginia","2015","West Virginia Natural Heritage Program. 2015. Coefficients of Conservatism for the Vascular Flora of West Virginia.  Wildlife Diversity Unit, West Virginia Division of Natural Resources, Elkins, WV."],["130","Western British Columbia, Canada - West of Coast and Cascade Mountains","2018","BC Wildlife Federation Project. Codes of Conservatism prepared by Jamie Fenneman and Terry Mcintosh. Includes only wetlands species. "],["85","Wisconsin (WDNR)-MW Wetland region (Southwestern and Southeastern Wisconsin)","2017","Chung-Gibson, M., Bernthal T., Doyle K., Wetter, M., Haber, E. (2017). Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Water Quality Bureau. From WDNR_FQA_Calculator_v1.5.17. Nomenclature from Wisconsin State Herbarium, University of Wisconsin-Madison (2016). COFC values from Bernthal, TW. Development of a Floristic Quality Assessment Methodology for Wisconsin. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, 2003. Note that regions differ only in Wetland Indicator Status."],["86","Wisconsin (WDNR)-NCNE Wetland Region (Northern and South-central Wisconsin)","2017","Chung-Gibson, M., Bernthal T., Doyle K., Wetter, M., Haber, E. (2017). Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Water Quality Bureau. From WDNR_FQA_Calculator_v1.5.17. Nomenclature from Wisconsin State Herbarium, University of Wisconsin-Madison (2016). COFC values from Bernthal, TW. Development of a Floristic Quality Assessment Methodology for Wisconsin. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, 2003. Note that regions differ only in Wetland Indicator Status."],["43","Wisconsin - Midwest Region","2014","Parker E.C., Curran M., Waechter Z.S, Grosskopf E.A. 2014. Wisconsin FQA (Floristic Quality Assessment) Databases for Midwest and Northcentral-Northeast Regions for Universal FQA Calculator Web site (http:\/\/universalfqa.org\/)."],["159","Wisconsin - NC-NE with Additions","2014","Scott Namestnik"],["44","Wisconsin - Northcentral-Northeast Region","2014","Parker E.C., Curran M., Waechter Z.S, Grosskopf E.A. 2014. Wisconsin FQA (Floristic Quality Assessment) Databases for Midwest and Northcentral-Northeast Regions for Universal FQA Calculator Web site (http:\/\/universalfqa.org\/)."]]}